• 05 02 2016 429716a-cig-clearchoice-banner-902x177
  • mse-big-banner-new-03-17-2016-416716a-tonernews-web-banner-mse-212
  • big-banner-ad_2-sean
  • 2toner1-2
  • cartridgewebsite-com-big-banner-02-09-07-2016
  • mse-big-new-banner-03-17-2016-416616a-tonernews-web-banner-mse-114
  • Print
  • Video and Film
  • 7035-overstock-banner-902x177
  • 4toner4


 user 2005-03-22 at 9:32:00 am Views: 55
  • #10981

    Digital-photo developing wars
    Many companies are lowering

    As the
    heavyweights slug it out, digital-camera owners are the big winners. They are in
    many cases finding that it is less expensive to print digitally captured images
    than those taken with film

    <>A price war has broken ouT in digital-photo printing.
    Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Costco Inc. and other retailers are cutting prices on
    digital-photo prints in an effort to win consumers who are switching to digital
    cameras from traditional film.

    The companies that make home printers also are stepping up their bid to grab
    more of this business. Hewlett-Packard Co., which has sold many consumers on the
    convenience of making digital images at home, says it will effectively cut the
    per-print costs by 17 percent for people who own H-P printers and buy its paper
    and ink.

    The price cuts come at a critical time for retailers and printer makers. With
    the shift from film to digital picking up steam, the next two years are seen by
    many experts as crucial in forming consumer habits.

    As the heavyweights slug it out, digital-camera owners are the big winners.
    They are in many cases finding that it is less expensive to print digitally
    captured images than those taken with film.

    Two weeks ago, Wal-Mart cut prices on standard 4-by-6-inch prints made from
    stored digital images to 19 cents from 24 cents. Wal-Mart, the nation’s largest
    photo finisher, charges 29 cents apiece for prints from film.

    For customers who don’t mind transferring the images from their computers to
    Wal-Mart.com’s Web site, the per-print price has dropped to 17 cents. (The
    prints are ready for pickup at the store in two days.) Wal-Mart’s wholesale-club
    affiliate, Sam’s Club, charges even less for a similar service: 15 cents, down
    from 16 cents before the recent round of cuts.

    To undercut Wal-Mart, wholesale-club leader Costco said last week it will
    lower its rates on one-hour processing to 17 cents from 19 cents. Meanwhile,
    drugstore giant Walgreen’s Inc. is running a digital-print special at 20 cents a
    piece for 50 prints in some markets, compared with the 29 cents it normally
    charges for digital or film prints.

    The other players in this battle are the online photo sites such as
    Shutterfly.com and Ofoto, which is owned by Eastman Kodak Co. These sites
    accounted for a combined 8 percent of all prints made last year.

    Photo finishers are hoping that the lower prices will induce consumers to
    print more of their digital pictures. Consumers spent an estimated $8.2 billion
    for prints last year, including those made at retail outlets and at home,
    according to Photo Marketing Association International, a trade group. But that
    is a fraction of the potential market: Only about 20 percent to 30 percent of
    digital pictures taken are developed.
    < style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255);">Of course, there’s another possible answer to this debate over where people
    will print their digital pictures in the future. Frank Baillergeon, an industry
    consultant from Eagle, Idaho, says photo finishers are engaging in “a lot of
    wishful thinking.”Long term, home printing is likely to decline to 15 percent of all prints,
    says Gael Lundeen, general manager photo-finishing and Web services for Fuji
    Photo Film USA Inc., the leader in the minilab business with customers including
    Wal-Mart. “The third wave of digital photographers is coming in, and they find
    digital printing at home is very expensive and very inconvenient,” Lundeen
    says.Most consumers, he says, appear to be perfectly content to keep most of their
    images in their PCs. “The evidence seems to be that the future for printing is
    smaller than anyone had imagined,” he says.Retailers and home-printer makers say the future of digital printing is
    leaning in their favor. Pierre Schaeffer, Kodak’s consumer imaging marketing
    manager, says some consumers may accept the higher cost of home printing to, for
    instance, easily print pictures at a party for guests to take. But if they have
    a camera full of hundreds of pictures from vacation, they would prefer to take
    them to a low-cost retailer, he argues.