• ncc-banner-902-x-177-june-2017
  • mse-big-banner-new-03-17-2016-416716a-tonernews-web-banner-mse-212
  • ces_web_banner_toner_news_902x1776
  • clover-depot-intl-us-ca-email-signature-05-10-2017-902x1772
  • 2toner1-2
  • Print
  • 4toner4
  • 05 02 2016 429716a-cig-clearchoice-banner-902x177
  • cartridgewebsite-com-big-banner-02-09-07-2016
  • banner-01-26-17b


 user 2008-04-01 at 11:56:22 am Views: 90
  • #19770

    Top executives stand to gain from a takeover
    Over the past couple of years, industry analysts have pointed to Lexmark International as a potential takeover target because of its ability to produce steady cash from sales of ink and toner, as well as its depressed stock price. But any such takeover could trigger lucrative payouts to the company’s top executives, and a recently released proxy statement shows that some of those payments have gone up compared to a year ago.

    Such agreements are common in top companies. And in Lexmark’s case, its top executives would have been eligible to receive between $1.25 million and $6.59 million, as of Dec. 31, if one of a number of scenarios occurred. Those include if the company was sold or if one person or group acquired more than 30 percent of Lexmark’s stock.By the company’s calculation, CEO Paul Curlander would have received $6.59 million; Chief Financial Officer John Gamble Jr., $2.98 million; Paul Rooke, head of the inkjet printer division, $4.04 million; Marty Canning, head of the laser printer division, $2.6 million; and General Counsel Vincent Cole, $1.25 million.Those payouts include long-term and stock-based incentive compensation. They’re far less than the payouts would have been on Dec. 31, 2006, when the executives would have received anywhere from $2.55 million to $17.26 million. The lower payouts reflect the past few years’ depressed performance, which has dramatically lowered incentive compensation.

    However, if the top executives were terminated after a change of control, the cash payments they would receive have increased.Had such an action occurred as of Dec. 31, the amounts paid would have totaled $7.8 million for Curlander, $2.97 million for Gamble, $3.99 million for Rooke, $1.75 million for Canning and $1.72 million for Cole.Those are increases of anywhere from 7 percent for Cole to more than 25 percent for Rooke.

    A company spokesman declined to comment specifically on the agreements.
    The compensation in Lexmark’s change-of-control agreements is far from extraordinary compared to notable cases like that of James Kilts of Gillette Co.Kilts’ contract called for a payout of more than $160 million when Gillette was absorbed into Procter & Gamble in 2005.Commonly called golden parachutes, these contract provisions are billed by corporations as a way to retain top-level executives, who would otherwise have difficulty finding similar employment should they be forced out of a job. They also can be seen as ways to reduce the likelihood of unfriendly takeovers.

    Shareholder proposal
    Lexmark also disclosed in its proxy that its board intends to fight a shareholder proposal looking to give stockholders a say, albeit a weak one, about executive pay.An investment fund associated with Amalgamated Bank, which bills itself as “America’s Labor Bank,” has proposed that stockholders be able to vote on whether they approve of the company’s executive compensation plans. The vote would be non-binding and not affect any actual compensation.The company said it opposes the plan for a variety of reasons, including that it would place it at a “competitive disadvantage” since other firms wouldn’t be subject to such a non-binding vote. Plus, shareholders can already write to the board members with their opinions.The results of the vote will be released after the company’s annual meeting of shareholders on April 24.

    Market share numbers
    Market research firm Gartner Inc. has released its 2007 year-in-review report, and it contained some good news for Lexmark, amid mixed news for the industry as a whole.Total inkjet printer shipments in the United States declined 1 percent, dragged down by a decline of 26 percent in single-function inkjets. Gartner said 71 percent of all inkjet printer shipments now are multi-function products that include features such as scanning or copying. Sales of those products grew 16 percent domestically.In the U.S. inkjet market, Lexmark posted a growth rate of 10 percent in 2007. The main driver of that growth was a 22 percent increase coming from sales of its line of wireless inkjet all-in-one printers, Gartner said.Overall, Lexmark remained second in U.S. inkjet market share, edging out Canon and Epson. All three distantly trail market leader HP. New inkjet player Kodak ended the year with a 1 percent market share.