Slider with alias home not found. There is nothing to show here!

Houston Audits Office Depot Finds Overcharges of $6.6m

Toner News Mobile Forums Latest Industry News Houston Audits Office Depot Finds Overcharges of $6.6m

Tonernews.com, December 18, 2012. USA
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts

  • Anonymous
    Inactive

    <p><font size=”5″><strong>Houston Audits Office Depot Finds Overcharges of $6.6million over four years</strong></font></p>
    <p><font size=”3″>By Emily Roach<br />
    Palm Beach Post Staff Writer </font><br />
    <font size=”4″>The city of Houston has joined the list of governments who claim Office Depot failed to honor the best-pricing guidelines provided for in their contracts. Houston revealed the results of an extensive audit Friday covering the years 2006-2010, the estimated overcharges of $1.7 million to $6.6 million.<br />
    <br />
    The city is a member of the U.S. Communities Government Purchasing Alliance, which had a group-purchasing contract with Office Depot. The Boca Raton-headquartered office supply superstore chain has settled complaints from the city of San Francisco, as well as the state of Florida. It is being investigated by the Justice Department and is the subject of a whistleblower lawsuit out of California based on the same group-purchasing agreement.<br />
    <br />
    An Office Depot response included in the audit said the contract didn’t guarantee the lowest price on each individual item, as the audit calculated, but rather a “basket of goods purchased by an average customer over time.”<br />
    <br />
    Office Depot Monday issued a statement on the auditor’s report saying it “rehashed old claims.” The company’s statement says those claims were “expressly rejected by the Florida Attorney General’s office back in 2010, after it conducted a two-year investigation into the same allegations.” The company paid $4.5 million in refunds in the Florida settlement.</font></p>

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty, or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action based on the content on our site.