Toner News Mobile › Forums › Latest Industry News › DO THIRD-PARTY INKS HAVE A HIGHER YIELD THAN OEM's ?
- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 9 years, 8 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
AnonymousInactivehttp://computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9104518&pageNumber=1
Cheap ink: Will it cost you?
Buying
replacement ink from a third-party vendor can save you big bucks. But
will you pay with lousy-looking prints that fade in no time? We did
months of testing to find out Razor-blade makers sell consumers the
shaver at low prices and then make a killing selling replacement
blades. Printer manufacturers do the same thing — selling their
printers on the cheap and then making bank on expensive consumables
like ink. It’s a time-tested practice that’s inspired a lively
aftermarket of cheap ink from third-party suppliers.The printer makers
— the original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs — claim that their
ink is worth the premium prices they charge for it. OEM ink, they say,
creates images that are more accurate and color-rich and longer-lived.
Third-party suppliers, on the other hand, say that their inks are just
as good but cost a lot less. For example, HP charges $18 for a black
ink cartridge for its Photosmart C5180 printer, but the same cartridge
remanufactured by Cartridge World costs only $8.75.Who’s telling the
truth? To find out, PC World teamed up with the Rochester Institute of
Technology, a respected research university known for its top-notch
laboratory for testing imaging products. Using popular ink jet printers
from Canon, Epson, Hewlett-Packard, Kodak and Lexmark, we ran
side-by-side tests of brand-name and third-party inks to compare image
quality and fade resistance. We also tracked how many pages each
cartridge churned out before running dry.Our tests show that all of the
third-party inks in our test group yielded more prints per cartridge —
on top of costing less — but that, with some notable exceptions, the
printer manufacturers’ ink we evaluated usually produced better-quality
prints and proved more resistant to fading. Of course, our conclusions
apply only to the printers we tested. We couldn’t test all of the
printers that are available (partly because you can’t get third-party
ink for all of them), so we picked a set of mainstream ink-jet printers
from recognized brands as a way of taking a snapshot view of the ink
market.The image quality face-off
The PC World Test Center
created a number of different text and image printouts, pitting
manufacturers’ inks against third-party inks in five different
printers. Image samples included a motion shot of cars on a racetrack,
a close-up of a butterfly, a photo of a group of people with different
skin tones and a black-and-white photo of a boat. For text we created
Word document samples on plain paper; for line art we designed a test
document with closely grouped vertical and horizontal lines. Judges
then rated the pages for qualities such as color accuracy and vibrancy,
sharpness of text and of line art, and contrast levels in grayscale
images.In most matchups, brand-name inks outperformed third-party
alternatives, but there were a few instances in which third-party inks
fared just as well as the brand-name inks did. For example, in
evaluations of output from the HP Photosmart C5180 printer, inks from
third-party challengers Cartridge World and LD Products earned scores
identical to those awarded to HP’s own ink, including an overall rating
of Good, on almost all of our tests. Both the HP and the third-party
inks printed color glossies quite well but were just so-so at producing
color images on plain paper.However, after RIT technicians submitted
their fade and yield results — and returned the printers they had
tested to us — they became concerned that some of the HP-brand ink
might have remained in the HP 5180 printer when it was printing test
images using third-party ink, because the printer has unusual, long ink
tubes that connect the cartridges with the printer nozzles. RIT
therefore recommended that we omit the HP and HP-compatible inks from
the fade test results.We subsequently conducted our own tests to
determine how much ink could have remained in the HP printer’s tubes.
To do so, we swapped the cyan and magenta inks (in a set of aftermarket
cartridges) and printed a color composition. The image quality changed
dramatically with the eighth print, indicating that the swapped ink had
flushed the HP ink; if any difference in image quality were to occur,
it would have to happen after the machine had printed eight pages. We
then printed 20 pages from each set of cartridges — HP’s ink and three
aftermarket inks — and saw no change in print quality, a result
tending to support our earlier conclusion that the print quality of the
third-party ink was equal to that of the HP ink.In output from an Epson
CX5000 printer, Epson’s and LD Products’ inks performed well overall,
though the Epson ink scored higher for its color glossies and grayscale
prints. Our judges didn’t care for the line-art output from either
vendor’s ink, however; one judge commented: “Blech! Lots of overlapping
lines. Horrible diagonals — jagged and feathery.Tested in a Canon
Pixma MP830 printer, Canon ink produced samples that looked
particularly sharp in our plain text, color glossy and grayscale print
tests. A third-party competitor, TrueStar, was no slouch either,
receiving an overall score of Good. The TrueStar ink excelled at color
glossies but fell far short of Canon ink at printing on plain paper,
whether the content consisted of color images, grayscale images, or
text.Lexmark’s house brand of ink (tested in a Lexmark X3470 printer)
earned a Good overall score, and its color glossy output snagged the
only superior rating our judges awarded. Meanwhile, the inks from
Cartridge World, Overstock.com and Walgreens earned lower marks
overall: For color glossies, the third-party inks earned scores of Good
or Very Good (below the ratings for Lexmark’s own ink), and their
grayscale output received a grade of Poor. Our panel criticized the
third-party inks for banding (abrupt changes between shades of the same
color) and for odd,Third-party ink yields were higher
On the
other hand, printing with the third-party cartridges in our tests will
save you anywhere from 3% to nearly 70% per page, depending on what
kind of printing you’re doing. For example, a set of remanufactured
Epson Stylus CX5000 color cartridges (cyan, magenta and yellow) from
123Inkjets.com printed nearly 70% more pages than the Epson ink, at a
cost of about 9 cents per page of color printing and 2.6 cents per page
for black. In contrast, Epson’s ink cost 30 cents per page of color
printing and about 10 cents per page for black. Epson’s Web site says
that a set of its color cartridges for the CX5000 should print about
350 pages, but the Epson cartridges we tested averaged only about 190
pages. In contrast 123Inkjets’ remanufactured color cartridges averaged
just over 320 pages.Third-party ink cartridges outlasted HP ink
cartridges by an even greater margin. 123Inkjets’ black cartridge for
the HP Photosmart C5180 printed at a cost-per-page of 0.6 cents, while
its brand-name HP counterpart printed at 2.2 cents per page. The
123Inkjets cartridge yielded 72% more pages than the HP before needing
replacement. 123Inkjet’s color cartridges (cyan, magenta and yellow)
did even better, yielding an average of 99% more pages than the HP
cartridges. Cartridge World cartridges, which cost less than HP’s OEM
versions on all counts, produced impressive page yield numbers, too:
Its black, cyan and magenta cartridges generated about 70% more pages
than the HP cartridges, and its yellow cartridge churned out 80%
more.The overall disparity between Canon inks and Cartridge World inks
was smaller. Both cartridge sets produced reasonably good page yields
and costs per page for black and color prints. For high-quality photo
prints, however, the Cartridge World cartridges were a bargain,
printing at 17 cents per page versus the Canon ink’s 26 cents per page.Manufacturers’ inks aged gracefully
Several
factors determine how well a color print withstands the effects of
aging. Heat, light and pollution play major roles, as do the inks’
chemical composition and the type of paper they’re printed on. To test
the inks’ resistance to these sources of image fading, RIT technicians
placed print samples in an image-durability chamber, which speeds up
the aging process by exposing the prints to concentrated levels of
ozone and ultraviolet light. In the end, all of the inks tested
suffered some loss of optical density, but the OEM inks generally
resisted fading better than their third-party competitors did.In RIT’s
study, Epson’s inks, on average, showed by far the greatest resistance
to fading. Test prints created using Epson ink lost only 0.5% of image
density in the ultraviolet light test, and only about 1.6% of image
density in the ozone exposure test. So slight a degree of degradation
is hard for the human eye to detect. Images created using
Epson-compatible 123Inkjet inks, the lone Epson competitor tested by
RIT, lost an average of 36% of their image density under UV exposure
and 29% under ozone exposureThe Kodak inks (tested with a Kodak
Easyshare 5300 printer) averaged 5% fade after 80 hours in the UV
chamber, while fading only 1.45% under ozone exposure. (At the time of
our testing, no compatible third-party ink had yet emerged to compete
with Kodak’s ink; LD Products has since brought out cartridges for the
5300.)The Canon brand ink faded 28% under exposure to ozone and 10%
under UV light. Canon-compatible Cartridge World inks faded about twice
that much — roughly 66% in the ozone test and 22% in the UV test.In
RIT’s UV test, the Lexmark ink proved far more fade-resistant than the
Walgreens ink and marginally better on average than the Cartridge World
and OverStock.com inks. None of the Lexmark or compatible inks faded
substantially in the ozone test. Canon supplies — particularly the
black and green inks — faded noticeably, but Cartridge World ink faded
even more in all colors except black.And now a Kodak moment…
Kodak
asserts that its cartridges have more going for them than a low price:
It says prints made with its inks are as vivid, colorful and accurate
as those made with any other manufacturers’ inks on the market. We
confirmed Kodak’s claims on both counts: Kodak inks were as economical
as the third-party inks, selling at $10 for black and $15 for color
cartridges, the same price as cartridge refills at Walgreens. The Kodak
inks’ cost per page is fairly good, too, at 2 cents for black printing,
8 cents for color and 12 cents for photo. Kodak inks earned scores on a
par with those of the other manufacturers’ inks in our print-quality
tests, and they rated especially highly in color glossy print jobs. And
Kodak inks were second only to Epson in resisting ozone and UV
light.Printer vendors say that their ink cartridges are more reliable
and pose fewer technical problems in their own printers than
third-party products do. Most third-party ink sellers remanufacture
(that is, they buy, clean and refill) used brand-name cartridges or
resell cartridges that they buy from another manufacturer.Our research
tended to corroborate the printer manufacturers’ claims. In the RIT
tests, brand-name cartridges consistently installed and ran without a
hitch, whereas some third-party supplies worked poorly or not at
all.For instance, a few Walgreens and OverStock.com cartridges designed
for the Lexmark X3470 printer suffered from color mixing (in which ink
from one cartridge leaks into another inside the printer) and from
print-quality defects. Supposedly compatible Cartridge World cartridges
— 40 of them, in fact — failed to work in the Epson Stylus CX5000
printer and could not be tested. (The Epson unit’s ink-replacement
software utility reported, “The installed ink cartridge is incompatible
with this printer” but didn’t provide details.) And two of 20
Lexmark-compatible cartridges from Cartridge World arrived at RIT with
ink leaking into the packaging prior to installation.These reliability
problems are not entirely the fault of the third-party ink sellers.
Some manufacturers put microchips in their cartridges and printers,
thus making it harder for third-party suppliers to design compatible
supplies. “They’ll put in a chip to keep third parties from being able
to reverse-engineer” the product, says IDC printer analyst Keith
Kmetz.For instance, Canon ink cartridges include a computer chip that
thwarts third-party competitors. “Nobody’s been able to replicate it,
figure it out, figure out how to reset it, get around it,” says Steven
Eaton, store manager of Cartridge World in Folsom, California. “Printer
manufacturers roll out new printers every six to eight months, and it’s
a struggle to keep up with all the new technologies,” Eaton
says.Vendors also use scare tactics to discredit third-party products.
“We see vendors saying your warranty could be affected if you’re not
using their genuine supplies,” says IDC’s Kmetz.”Usage [of a
third-party ink cartridge] alone does not void the warranty,” says
Tricia Judge, executive director of the International Imaging
Technology Council, a trade group for toner and ink suppliers. The only
way the warranty can be voided, according to Judge, is if a third-party
product damages the printer. And if you’re dealing with a legitimate
aftermarket vendor, “they’re going to repair or replace the printer for
you if their cartridge damages it.”The bottom line on printer inks
Depending
on your printer, you may be able to find cheaper, third-party inks that
perform as well as or better than the brand-name stuff. In our study we
found that third-party ink cartridges usually cost less and often
yielded more prints than their manufacturer-made rivals. On the other
hand, in most cases, we confirmed the printer manufacturers’ claims
that their own inks produce better-looking images.Deciding between
brand-name and third-party alternatives depends in part on how you plan
to use your prints. If you want high-quality color photos that future
generations will be able to enjoy, then OEM inks are usually a better
choice.Many of us, however, don’t need the best ink supplies that money
can buy. If your prints tend to be for one-time-only office
presentations, text documents for school, or temporary color images
(such as plain-paper photos), inks from third-party suppliers may be a
reasonable cost-saving option. And over the lifetime of your printer,
cost savings from buying third-party inks can be considerable.Where and how to buy cheap ink
The
aftermarket for printer ink can be a tricky place to shop. Third-party
cartridges cost less than the manufacturers’ brands — which is why
people buy them. But it can be a lot harder to tell whether a
third-party vendor sells high-quality ink products.One time-tested
method is to shop at an established retailer (online or
brick-and-mortar) that guarantees the quality of its products. Obvious
examples include office supply chains such as 123Inkjets, Cartridge
World, Office Depot, Office Max and Staples, all of which carry
third-party ink cartridges.But finding third-party ink for your
specific printer model can be a challenge, particularly if your unit is
very new, very old or not very popular. Before driving around town to
find the right cartridge, do a little homework online. At today’s
insane gas prices, you could end up spending $20 on fuel just to save
$10 on an ink cartridge.Like the online arms of other major retailers,
Staples.com has an ink and toner finder. Click the link for to find a
decent assortment of third-party supplies for Brother, Canon and
Lexmark printers. If you find compatible ink, you can buy it online or
check with your local outlet to see whether it has the product in
stock.If you’re dealing with a vendor that you haven’t used before, ask
questions. A reputable online ink retailer will provide names and
contact information for the ink manufacturers that it buys its supplies
from.When shopping for remanufactured cartridges, ask the third-party
supplier how thoroughly it inspects used cartridges before refilling
them. “Do they look for cracks? Do they test the electrical
characteristics of the cartridge? A cartridge can look fine but have a
broken electrical component, and then it won’t work,” says Tricia Judge
of the International Imaging Technology Council. The vendor should also
test the cartridge after the refill, Judge adds.How we tested the longevity of inks
All
photographs fade over time, as sunlight and pollution take their toll.
But to determine whether printer manufacturers’ inks last longer than
those of third-party suppliers, researchers need to condense years of
image fading into just a few days. How do they do it?Technicians in the
Imaging Products Laboratory at the Rochester Institute of Technology
(RIT) place color prints in environmental chambers where they can
accelerate the prints’ exposure to ultraviolet light and ozone — the
atmospheric pollutants responsible for sapping the color from graphics
as years go by.For this feature, RIT tested print samples from
manufacturers’ inks and from third-party aftermarket inks. Altogether,
it tested 10 cartridges per color, per vendor.For the light-fastness
tests, RIT technicians placed the print samples in a Xenon-arc chamber
for 80 hours at 145 degrees Fahrenheit, exposing the samples to an
increased level of ultraviolet light. In the chamber, brief bursts of
high-intensity light mimic the effects of a low-intensity exposure over
a period of many years.The laboratory also ran tests to determine how
well a print resisted the effects of ozone or pollution in the real
world. In this test, RIT researchers measured the image’s color values
before and after a seven-day exposure to air containing five parts per
million of ozone. -
AuthorJuly 1, 2008 at 11:05 AM
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.