PAY ATTENTION: USITC Issues Rare Public Statement on Behalf of Canon Vs. 11 (Mostly Chinese) Toner Cloner Manufacturers, Resellers and Distributors.
Click on link to download the file or email us if you cannot, and we’ll email you a copy: tonernews@gmail.com
CERTAIN TONER SUPPLY CONTAINERS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF (II) 337_1260_notice_02152022sgl 02 15 2022
The Commission instituted two separate investigations and defined the scope of the present investigation as whether there is a violation of section 337 based on the allegations of infringement as to the asserted claims of the ’649, ’551, and ’402 patents as to the accused products identified in the notice of investigation. Id. The notice of investigation named eleven respondents: Sichuan XingDian Technology Co., Ltd. of Sichuan, China; Sichuan Wiztoner Technology Co., Ltd. of Sichuan, China; Anhuiyatengshangmaoyouxiangongsi of Ganyuqu, China; ChengDuXiangChangNanShiYouSheBeiYouXianGongSi of SiChuanSheng, China; Digital Marketing Corporation d/b/a Digital Buyer Marketing Company of Los Angeles, California; Do It Wiser, LLC d/b/a Image Toner (“Do It Wiser”) of Wilmington, Delaware; Hefeierlandianzishangwuyouxiangongsi of Chengdushi, China; Shenzhenshi Keluodeng Kejiyouxiangognsi of Guangdong, China (“KenoGen”); MITOCOLOR INC. of Rowland Heights, California; Xianshi yanliangqu canqiubaihuodianshanghang of Shanxisheng, China; and Zhuhai Henyun Image Co., Ltd. of Zhuhai, China. Id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (“OUII”) is also named as a party. Id. at 19287-88. The question of whether there is a violation of section 337 based on the allegations of infringement as to the asserted claims of the remaining patents is the subject of the severed investigation based on the same complaint, Inv. No. 337-TA-1259.
