Slider with alias home not found. There is nothing to show here!

Encryptawave Technologies Sues Lexmark International.

Toner News Mobile Forums Toner News Main Forums Encryptawave Technologies Sues Lexmark International.

Tonernews.com, October 28, 2024. USA
  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts

  • toner
    Keymaster

    Encryptawave Technologies Sues Lexmark International.
    **Case No. 1:24-cv-3002** has been filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado by Encryptawave Technologies LLC against Lexmark International, Inc. The case centers around allegations of patent infringement related to a patented technology for wireless communication security.
    Click here to download the lawsuit for free

    **Parties Involved:
    **- **Plaintiff:** Encryptawave Technologies LLC, an Illinois limited liability company based in Lake Forest, California. **Defendant:** Lexmark International, Inc., a Delaware corporation with a significant presence at its Longmont, Colorado location.

    Jurisdiction and Venue
    The plaintiff asserts that the court has subject matter jurisdiction under Title 35 of the United States Code, specifically citing 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). The court’s jurisdiction over Lexmark is based on the company’s business activities in Colorado, where it allegedly committed acts of patent infringement. The complaint highlights that Lexmark has derived revenue from its operations in the state, making it reasonable for the company to anticipate legal action there.

    Venue is deemed appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) since Lexmark maintains a business address in Colorado, where some of the alleged infringements took place.

    Patent Infringement Claims
    The complaint specifically targets United States Patent No. 7,233,664, titled “Dynamic Security Authentication for Wireless Communication Networks,” issued on June 19, 2007. Encryptawave claims exclusive rights to the patent, stating that it has the standing to prosecute this case against Lexmark for infringement.

    The ‘664 Patent focuses on a dynamic authentication method that enhances security among wireless communication network nodes. It aims to facilitate secure communication over unsecured channels, ensuring data integrity, privacy, and user authentication.

    This lawsuit underscores the growing importance of patent protection in the technology sector, particularly as businesses increasingly rely on secure communication technologies. As the case progresses, the outcome may significantly impact both Encryptawave and Lexmark, potentially setting a precedent for similar patent infringement claims in the industry.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty, or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action based on the content on our site.