USITC: Epson Takes Legal Action Against 20 Chinese Clone Ink Cartridges Counterfeiters. (Download complaints for free)

toner · 2025-05-14T16:44:07-04:00

In a bold move to protect its intellectual property rights, Epson has filed two complaints with the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC), accusing many Chinese companies and individuals of importing and selling counterfeit ink cartridges in the United States. The complaints, submitted on May 13, 2025, allege that these entities have violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which prohibits the importation, sale, or distribution of products that infringe on U.S. intellectual property. Don’t pay for this news at action-intell.com when this same news is free on Tonernews.com. DOWNLOAD COMPLAINTS FOR FREE: DN 3827 / DN 3828 The Allegations: Widespread Distribution of Counterfeit Clone Ink Products Epson’s complaints center on the importation and sale of counterfeit ink cartridges and their components, which are allegedly infringing upon Epson’s patents and trademarks. These counterfeit products, marketed under various brand names, have flooded the U.S. market, posing risks to both consumers and Epson’s business. The companies involved, which are primarily based in China, allegedly sell counterfeit ink products that damage consumer printers and undermine Epson’s innovations. The companies named in the complaints are: Dongguan Ocbestjet Digital Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Ocbestjet of China Ocbestjet Printer Consumables (HK) Co., Ltd. d/b/a Ocbestjet of China Tatrix International China Co., Ltd. of China Luozhi Trading Co., Ltd. of China Shenzhen Hongxinyuan E-Commerce Co., Ltd. d/b/a Jianjai of China Shenzhen Kaizhen Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a PayForLess of China Zhuhai Zhenyang Electronics Co., Ltd. d/b/a Oinkwere of China Shangrao Shixuan E-Commerce Co., Ltd. d/b/a Inkgo of China Zhuhai Hengyunda Electronics Co., Ltd. d/b/a Upriin of China Zhuhai Rongtaida Electronics Co., Ltd. d/b/a Hookink of China Zhuhai Shi Wei Tai Electronics Co., Ltd. d/b/a Ondula-A of China Zhuhai Yixing Electronics Co., Ltd. d/b/a Greenjob USSOP of China Mei Jin Technology HK Co., Limited d/b/a YBFeir of China ZhuHai MeiJiAn Trading Co., Ltd. d/b/a HaloFox of China Qiong Wang d/b/a 7-magic of China Shen Zhen Sailing Technology Limited d/b/a Triple-Color of China Zhuhai Shuofeng E-commerce Co., Ltd. d/b/a super-ink-club of China Zhuhai Bowang Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a office-print-club of China Mountain Peak, Inc. d/b/a Billiontree Technology USA, Inc. d/b/a Toner Kingdom of China Straightouttaink, LP d/b/a discountinkllc, einkshop2014, Inkpro, inkprousa of China These companies and individuals are accused of selling counterfeit ink cartridges and related components within the United States, potentially causing substantial damage to both Epson’s brand and consumers’ devices. The counterfeit ink products are often sold through online marketplaces, such as Amazon, eBay, and other retail outlets. Legal Grounds: Section 337 of the Tariff Act Epson’s legal action is grounded in Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337), which allows U.S. companies to file complaints with the USITC if their intellectual property is being infringed upon by imported goods. If the USITC determines that a violation has occurred, it has the authority to issue a General Exclusion Order (GEO), a Limited Exclusion Order (LEO), or Cease and Desist Orders (CDO), each aimed at stopping the infringing products from entering the U.S. market. Epson is requesting the issuance of a General Exclusion Order, which would block the importation of all counterfeit ink cartridges, regardless of manufacturer, to protect the U.S. market from the illegal products. Alternatively, Epson is seeking a Limited Exclusion Order to target specific companies, along with Cease-and-Desist Orders to prevent further sales of counterfeit products by these named entities. The Impact of Counterfeit Clone Ink Cartridges Counterfeit ink cartridges can cause a range of problems for consumers and manufacturers alike. For Epson, counterfeit products directly undermine its revenue and intellectual property. The influx of inferior ink cartridges into the U.S. market also leads to significant consumer dissatisfaction, with reports of poor print quality, leaks, and potential damage to printers. These issues cost consumers money and create a poor experience for those who unknowingly purchase counterfeit products. Additionally, counterfeit goods create unfair competition in the market. Companies that produce legitimate, high-quality products like Epson are forced to compete with cheaper, subpar alternatives. This harms the overall market integrity, lowering the standard for consumers and putting law-abiding businesses at a disadvantage. Chinese Companies and the Global Counterfeit Trade The accused companies represent a broad spectrum of manufacturers, suppliers, and distributors, with most of them based in China. This case reflects the larger issue of international counterfeit trade, which is particularly rampant in industries like electronics and office supplies. Many of the companies named in the complaint are operating under business names that obscure their true identity, making it harder for consumers to identify and avoid counterfeit products. While this case focuses on ink cartridges, the broader issue of intellectual property infringement and counterfeit goods affects numerous industries and poses significant challenges for global trade. The ease of online shopping and the rise of international marketplaces have made it increasingly difficult for consumers and businesses to differentiate between authentic and counterfeit products. Epson’s Efforts to Safeguard Its Brand In filing this legal complaint, Epson aims to protect both its intellectual property and the integrity of its brand. The company’s request for General Exclusion Orders and Cease and Desist Orders is a proactive measure to stop counterfeit ink cartridges from further infiltrating the U.S. market. Epson is seeking to send a clear message to counterfeiters that it will take all necessary legal steps to protect its products and its customers. Beyond legal action, Epson’s efforts also highlight the importance of consumer education. The company is working to raise awareness about the dangers of counterfeit products and to help consumers identify and avoid fake ink cartridges that could potentially damage their printers. Epson’s legal filings reflect the company’s commitment to protecting its intellectual property and ensuring that consumers have access to safe, high-quality products. The case against these Chinese companies underscores the global nature of counterfeiting and the significant challenges that companies like Epson face in combating it. As the USITC considers Epson’s request for legal remedies, the outcome of this case could set important precedents for how counterfeit goods are handled in the U.S. market. For Epson, this is not just a fight for revenue protection but also for maintaining consumer trust and ensuring that counterfeit products do not undermine the integrity of the marketplace.

Tonernews.com, May 14, 2025. USA

This topic is empty.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)

Author

Posts
#634769

toner
Keymaster

In a bold move to protect its intellectual property rights, Epson has filed two complaints with the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC), accusing many Chinese companies and individuals of importing and selling counterfeit ink cartridges in the United States. The complaints, submitted on May 13, 2025, allege that these entities have violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which prohibits the importation, sale, or distribution of products that infringe on U.S. intellectual property.

Don’t pay for this news at action-intell.com when this same news is free on Tonernews.com.
DOWNLOAD COMPLAINTS FOR FREE: DN 3827 / DN 3828

The Allegations: Widespread Distribution of Counterfeit Clone Ink Products
Epson’s complaints center on the importation and sale of counterfeit ink cartridges and their components, which are allegedly infringing upon Epson’s patents and trademarks. These counterfeit products, marketed under various brand names, have flooded the U.S. market, posing risks to both consumers and Epson’s business. The companies involved, which are primarily based in China, allegedly sell counterfeit ink products that damage consumer printers and undermine Epson’s innovations.

The companies named in the complaints are:
Dongguan Ocbestjet Digital Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Ocbestjet of China
Ocbestjet Printer Consumables (HK) Co., Ltd. d/b/a Ocbestjet of China
Tatrix International China Co., Ltd. of China
Luozhi Trading Co., Ltd. of China
Shenzhen Hongxinyuan E-Commerce Co., Ltd. d/b/a Jianjai of China
Shenzhen Kaizhen Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a PayForLess of China
Zhuhai Zhenyang Electronics Co., Ltd. d/b/a Oinkwere of China
Shangrao Shixuan E-Commerce Co., Ltd. d/b/a Inkgo of China
Zhuhai Hengyunda Electronics Co., Ltd. d/b/a Upriin of China
Zhuhai Rongtaida Electronics Co., Ltd. d/b/a Hookink of China
Zhuhai Shi Wei Tai Electronics Co., Ltd. d/b/a Ondula-A of China
Zhuhai Yixing Electronics Co., Ltd. d/b/a Greenjob USSOP of China
Mei Jin Technology HK Co., Limited d/b/a YBFeir of China
ZhuHai MeiJiAn Trading Co., Ltd. d/b/a HaloFox of China
Qiong Wang d/b/a 7-magic of China
Shen Zhen Sailing Technology Limited d/b/a Triple-Color of China
Zhuhai Shuofeng E-commerce Co., Ltd. d/b/a super-ink-club of China
Zhuhai Bowang Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a office-print-club of China
Mountain Peak, Inc. d/b/a Billiontree Technology USA, Inc. d/b/a Toner Kingdom of China
Straightouttaink, LP d/b/a discountinkllc, einkshop2014, Inkpro, inkprousa of China

These companies and individuals are accused of selling counterfeit ink cartridges and related components within the United States, potentially causing substantial damage to both Epson’s brand and consumers’ devices. The counterfeit ink products are often sold through online marketplaces, such as Amazon, eBay, and other retail outlets.

Legal Grounds: Section 337 of the Tariff Act
Epson’s legal action is grounded in Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337), which allows U.S. companies to file complaints with the USITC if their intellectual property is being infringed upon by imported goods. If the USITC determines that a violation has occurred, it has the authority to issue a General Exclusion Order (GEO), a Limited Exclusion Order (LEO), or Cease and Desist Orders (CDO), each aimed at stopping the infringing products from entering the U.S. market.

Epson is requesting the issuance of a General Exclusion Order, which would block the importation of all counterfeit ink cartridges, regardless of manufacturer, to protect the U.S. market from the illegal products. Alternatively, Epson is seeking a Limited Exclusion Order to target specific companies, along with Cease-and-Desist Orders to prevent further sales of counterfeit products by these named entities.

The Impact of Counterfeit Clone Ink Cartridges
Counterfeit ink cartridges can cause a range of problems for consumers and manufacturers alike. For Epson, counterfeit products directly undermine its revenue and intellectual property. The influx of inferior ink cartridges into the U.S. market also leads to significant consumer dissatisfaction, with reports of poor print quality, leaks, and potential damage to printers. These issues cost consumers money and create a poor experience for those who unknowingly purchase counterfeit products.

Additionally, counterfeit goods create unfair competition in the market. Companies that produce legitimate, high-quality products like Epson are forced to compete with cheaper, subpar alternatives. This harms the overall market integrity, lowering the standard for consumers and putting law-abiding businesses at a disadvantage.

Chinese Companies and the Global Counterfeit Trade
The accused companies represent a broad spectrum of manufacturers, suppliers, and distributors, with most of them based in China. This case reflects the larger issue of international counterfeit trade, which is particularly rampant in industries like electronics and office supplies. Many of the companies named in the complaint are operating under business names that obscure their true identity, making it harder for consumers to identify and avoid counterfeit products.

While this case focuses on ink cartridges, the broader issue of intellectual property infringement and counterfeit goods affects numerous industries and poses significant challenges for global trade. The ease of online shopping and the rise of international marketplaces have made it increasingly difficult for consumers and businesses to differentiate between authentic and counterfeit products.

Epson’s Efforts to Safeguard Its Brand
In filing this legal complaint, Epson aims to protect both its intellectual property and the integrity of its brand. The company’s request for General Exclusion Orders and Cease and Desist Orders is a proactive measure to stop counterfeit ink cartridges from further infiltrating the U.S. market. Epson is seeking to send a clear message to counterfeiters that it will take all necessary legal steps to protect its products and its customers.

Beyond legal action, Epson’s efforts also highlight the importance of consumer education. The company is working to raise awareness about the dangers of counterfeit products and to help consumers identify and avoid fake ink cartridges that could potentially damage their printers.

Epson’s legal filings reflect the company’s commitment to protecting its intellectual property and ensuring that consumers have access to safe, high-quality products. The case against these Chinese companies underscores the global nature of counterfeiting and the significant challenges that companies like Epson face in combating it.

As the USITC considers Epson’s request for legal remedies, the outcome of this case could set important precedents for how counterfeit goods are handled in the U.S. market. For Epson, this is not just a fight for revenue protection but also for maintaining consumer trust and ensuring that counterfeit products do not undermine the integrity of the marketplace.
Author

May 14, 2025 at 4:44 PM

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty, or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action based on the content on our site.