Ricoh production-print customers may be facing a controversial Fiery monopoly problem as critics question why owners of high-end Ricoh digital presses have so little real choice when selecting a production digital front end (DFE). While Fiery remains one of the printing industry’s most established and capable workflow platforms, the issue raised by Print Reviewer is whether Ricoh customers—particularly those investing in machines such as the Pro C9500—are being pushed into an expensive Fiery ecosystem with limited competitive alternatives. With controllers, software, subscriptions, workflow tools and operator training creating significant switching costs, critics argue that Ricoh owners can become locked into one technology supplier for years. The controversy is not that Fiery has been proven to hold an illegal monopoly, but whether Ricoh is giving customers enough competition and choice to challenge Fiery on pricing, innovation and long-term licensing costs. Ricoh has supported alternative DFE options on other presses, raising the question: if Ricoh can offer customers a choice elsewhere, why are some of its biggest production-print buyers still effectively being told to choose between one Fiery and another Fiery?