The Lexmark Vs. S.C.C. Inc Saga Continues ….

2013-01-29T08:54:02-05:00

The Lexmark Vs. S.C.C. Inc Saga Continues .... Only Rivals Can Lodge False Ad Claims, Lexmark Argues By Scott Flaherty Law360, New York -- Lexmark International Inc. recently urged the U.S. Supreme Court to consider if Static Control Components Inc. had standing to make false advertising claims in response to a Lexmark patent and copyright suit, saying only direct competitors should be allowed to bring those claims. In a Jan. 14 petition for writ of certiorari, Lexmark told the high court it should take another look at a Sixth Circuit decision from August, in which a three-judge appellate panel determined that Static Control had standing to bring false advertising counterclaims... To view the full article, click on this link below and register for a 7 day free trial

Tonernews.com, January 29, 2013. USA

This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 11 years, 2 months ago by Anonymous.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)

Author

Posts
#5882

Anonymous
Inactive

The Lexmark Vs. S.C.C. Inc Saga Continues ….

Only Rivals Can Lodge False Ad Claims, Lexmark Argues
By Scott Flaherty
Law360, New York — Lexmark International Inc. recently urged the U.S. Supreme Court to consider if Static Control Components Inc. had standing to make false advertising claims in response to a Lexmark patent and copyright suit, saying only direct competitors should be allowed to bring those claims.

In a Jan. 14 petition for writ of certiorari, Lexmark told the high court it should take another look at a Sixth Circuit decision from August, in which a three-judge appellate panel determined that Static Control had standing to bring false advertising counterclaims…

To view the full article, click on this link below and register for a 7 day free trial
Author

January 29, 2013 at 8:54 AM

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty, or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action based on the content on our site.