Slide 1
Slide 2
Slide 3
Slide 5
Slide 4
Slide 6
Slide 7
Slide 8
Slide 9
Slide 10
Slide 11
Slide 12
Slide 13
Slide 14
Slide 15
Slide 16
Slide 17
Slide 18
Slide 19
Slide 20
Slide 21
Slide 23
Slide 24
Slide 24
Slide 25
Slide 26
Slide 27
Slide 28
Slide 29
Slide 30
Slide 31
Slide 32
Slide 33
Slide 34
Slide 35
Slide 36
Slide 37
Slide 38
Slide 39
Slide 40
Slide 41
Slide 42
Slide 43
Slide 44
Slide 45
Slide 46
Slide 47
Slide 48
Slide 49
Slide 50
Slide 51
Slide 52
Slide 53
Slide 54
Slide 54
Slide 55
Slide 56
Slide 57
Slide 58
Slide 58
Slide 59
Slide 59
Slide 60
Slide 61
Slide 61
Slide 62
Slide 63

China Ninestar Banned from Selling Toner in the United State for Good, Loses Landmark Lawsuit.

Toner News Mobile Forums Toner News Main Forums China Ninestar Banned from Selling Toner in the United State for Good, Loses Landmark Lawsuit.

Tonernews.com, March 1, 2024. USA
  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts

  • jim
    Keymaster

    China Ninestar Banned from Selling Toner
    in the United State for Good, Loses Landmark Lawsuit.

    In a significant legal setback for Ninestar Corporation, the U.S. Court of International Trade has upheld an import ban on the company’s printer products, denying Ninestar’s request for a preliminary injunction. The court’s decision, which was made public on February 29, 2024, reinforces the United States’ commitment to combatting forced labor practices. (download final ruling for free)
    Ninestar motion is Denied, and the Embargo Remains in Force 03 01 2024

    We Are The Champions: Over Sin | The Way I See Things

    Ninestar Corporation, along with its affiliates, is a Chinese manufacturer and seller of laser printers and related products to U.S. companies and consumers. The U.S. government, citing concerns over forced labor, had previously placed Ninestar on the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) Entity List, effectively barring the company’s products from entering the U.S. market.

    The court’s ruling, issued by Judge Gary S. Katzmann, concluded that Ninestar’s motion for a preliminary injunction did not meet the legal standards required for such relief. The judge emphasized that the plaintiffs are not required to exhaust their administrative remedies under the particular facts of this case.

    This decision is a clear indication of the U.S. judiciary’s support for the UFLPA and its broader implications for international trade and human rights. Companies on the UFLPA Entity List are presumed to employ forced labor and face significant restrictions on their ability to export products to the United States.

    The denial of Ninestar’s injunction request marks a pivotal moment in the enforcement of the UFLPA and serves as a warning to other companies that might be complicit in forced labor practices. It underscores the importance of ethical labor practices in global supply chains and the U.S. government’s resolve to prevent the importation of products linked to human rights abuses.

    Tonernews.com: Despite the ban on Ninestar and its subsidiaries, they may still be smuggling their products into the US market through some of their large resellers and distributors, such as SCC, Arlington, ACM, LD Products, and even Lexmark. We urge the industry to stay alert and report any suspicious activity to Tonernews.com, and to also monitor any new entrants that may be sourcing large amounts of goods from China. We are very thankful for the US government’s efforts to support the US toner recycling and remanufacturing industry by safeguarding US production and consumers from these dangerous counterfeit products. We also commend our customs and enforcement agents who are still working hard to prevent the entry of these illicit goods into the US. We should also remember the plight of the Uyghurs, who are still held and kept captive in China, and recognize that human rights are universal rights for all people.
    Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) - Antislavery/Modern Slavery - ESG Reporting Intelligence

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty, or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action based on the content on our site.