OEM’S RIP-OFF CONSUMERS $6B ANNUALLY

Toner News Mobile Forums Toner News Main Forums OEM’S RIP-OFF CONSUMERS $6B ANNUALLY

Date: Wednesday November 21, 2007 01:59:00 pm
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts

  • Anonymous
    Inactive

    Overpriced Printer Ink Costs Consumers $6 Billion Annually
    Recent
    Study Finds Consumers Have No Effective Basis for Comparison when
    Purchasing Inkjet Printer Ink; Leads to Unnecessarily High Spending on
    Ink

    WASHINGTON,
    Nov. 07 — The American Consumer Institute(ACI) urges consumers this
    holiday season to do their research before purchasing a home printer —
    or getting one for free with a computer purchase. A new white paper
    entitled “Inkjet Prices, Printing Costs and Consumer Welfare,” exposes
    pricing strategies within the inkjet industry that leave consumers at a
    major disadvantage and ultimately cost them an estimated $6 billion a
    year, collectively.     The study finds that inkjet printers are
    routinely under-priced to entice consumers to purchase the product.
    Once purchased, consumers are trapped into spending hundreds of extra
    dollars to operate the printers due to the high price of printer ink.
    This business model reflects the well known “razor/razor blade model”
    wherein durable assets (printers) are sold below cost and “consumables”
    (ink) are marked up substantially. In fact, ink is currently priced
    higher per milliliter than the world’s finest champagne, gasoline and
    most luxury fragrances.”Value shoppers” are seriously handicapped and
    mislead at the point of sale by the lack of information about printing
    costs. They pay for cartridges without knowing how much ink is in them
    or how many pages one will print. Consumers shop blindly due to a lack
    of standardized printer ink unit pricing (such as cents-per-page
    printed). It is not enough to look at printer cartridges’ prices
    either, since the lowest priced cartridges often have the highest
    cost-of-ink per page. “When purchasing an inkjet printer, consumers
    should consider the full cost of printing, the cost of the ink used to
    print as well as the cost of the printer itself,” explains Dr. Larry F.
    Darby, coauthor of the report. “Free or low-cost printers are ‘fools
    gold’ when they lock consumers into using high cost ink for the life of
    the printer. Consumers are comparing apples and oranges as they shop
    for printers. It’s very confusing.”Consumers would be well served by
    adoption of a form of truth-in-labeling to allow them to compare each
    printer’s cost-of-ink per printed page. The paper concludes that
    competition in the inkjet printer and ink sectors would be much more
    intense if consumers were made aware of  the cost implications of their
    printer choices. Better information means lower costs for consumers.

    The
    study estimates that consumers would reap a sizable gain, estimated to
    be conservatively $6 billion per year once information-driven
    competition in the inkjet industry is fully realized in the
    marketplace. The study was conducted by TeleNomic Research with an
    unrestricted grant from Kodak. The American Consumer Institute received
    no funding for this study’s release. A synopsis of the findings,
    consumer tips to save on printer costs and a copy of the full study are
    available at available at http://www.aci-citizenresearch.org.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.